One thing I have learned about lists of names in the Torah: While at first glance they seem repetitive, closer inspection usually reveals an aberration of some sort. And behind that aberration often lies a story.
The end of parashat Naso is the longest chapter in the Torah, at 89 verses. It describes the offerings that are brought by chieftains from each of the twelve tribes.
First, they get to collaborate on a gift of 6 carts and 12 oxen to pull them. These are assigned to two of the Levite clans whose job it is to disassemble and carry the Mishkan, the Tabernacle.
But they are not done yet. They have more to give. God instructs that each of them should present his gift individually, one per day for twelve days.
The gifts are identical: one silver bowl and one silver basin, each filled with choice flour mixed with oil; a golden ladle filled with incense; a bull, a ram and a lamb in its first year as a burnt offering; a goat for a sin offering; and two oxen, five rams, five he-goats, and five yearling lambs as a sacrifice of well-being.
Have you ever showed up to a birthday party and found that the gift you brought, that you were so excited about, is exactly the same as someone else’s gift. Funny? Embarrassing?
The Torah details the offerings twelve times in a row, for every single chieftain. Other than substituting the name of the tribe, the presenter and the day number, the text repeats itself twelve times, word for word exactly the same – – – almost.
There are three small aberrations, all appearing with regard to the first two names. The first is that the title nasi, meaning “chieftain,” is absent from the first name on the list, Nachshon ben Aminadav. The eleven other donors are given the honorific nasi.
The second aberration is that for the first two donors, Nachshon from the tribe of Yehudah and Netanel ben Tzuar of the tribe of Issachar, their names are mentioned before the tribe, as in “on the second day, Netanel son of Tzuar, chieftain of Issachar.” For the other ten, the tribe is mentioned first, as in “on the third day, it was the chieftain of the Zebulinites, Eliav son of Chelon.”
The third and final difference also has to do with Netanel ben Tzuar of Issachar. He is the only chieftain whose offering is accompanied by the verb hikriv, which means “to offer a sacrifice.” For all the others, the introductory phrase at the beginning of verse 12 – va’yehi ha-makriv… et korbano – the one who offered his sacrifice – serves as an introduction to their offering. This is explained by several of the commentators (Rashi on 7:24, Rashbam and Ibn Ezra on 7:13).
I know. That is pretty nitpicky. You might not have even caught the distinctions.
Operating under the assumption that the Torah is never sloppy, these three small aberrations must mean something. Let’s see if we can figure out what they mean.
First, why is the word nasi , chieftain, missing from the description of Nachshon? When he appears elsewhere in the Torah, he is certainly described as a chieftain of the tribe of Judah. Nachshon, by the way, is credited by the midrash as being the first of the Israelites to walk into the Sea of Reeds. Only when the water reached above his nose did the sea split. Nachshon also happens to be the Brother in Law of Aaron the High Priest.
A midrash (Numbers Rabbah 13:17) explains that God is concerned that the rest of the chieftains might feel jealous of Nachshon for getting to present his gifts first. As a sign of Nachshon’s humility, and to convey to the others that all of the gifts are valued equally by God, Nachshon’s honor is diminished slightly by leaving out his title.
The next irregularity in the list is that for the first two chieftains, their names are mentioned before their tribes. Rashi cites a midrash (Sifrei Bemidbar 48) which explains that Nachshon collected his donation from his own personal wealth, not from the tribe. He is especially generous.
As for Netanel from Issachar, the reason is connected to the third aberration. He is the only chieftain who gets his own verb. In fact, he gets it twice.
Rashi (on 7: 18), citing a midrash (Sifrei Bemidbar 52), relates the following story: When the tribe of Reuven, who is the first born of Jacob’s 12 sons, sees that he is being skipped, he gets angry and complains to Moses. “It was bad enough when you let Yehudah go first. Now you are letting Issachar go ahead of me?!”
Moses scolds him: “It was God Himself who commanded that the tribes go in this order!”
What is so special about the tribe of Issachar, Rashi asks? Two things: First, Issachar is known to be a tribe that truly values talmud Torah, the study of Torah. Second, it is Netanel of Issachar who encourages his fellow chieftains to bring these donations. Thus, says Rashi, the verb hikriv appears twice to reflect the two reasons that Issachar is moved up.
So we see that these three tiny departures from the linguistic pattern are explained as indications of meritorious actions and/or characteristics of Nachshon and Netanel, along with their respective tribes.
There is a bigger question, however, regarding the overall order in which the tribes appear. There are many passages in the Torah and in later books of the bible that list the sons of Jacob or their eponymous tribes. The order, however, is not always the same.*
Sometimes, it follows their birth order. Other times, the lists seem to reflect other considerations.
The Book of Numbers opens with a military census of all adult male Israelites. They are to be counted by tribe. In the opening verses of chapter one, we find a list of the twelve tribes, along with their chieftains who are assigned to assist Moses in conducting the census. They are the exact same chieftains who bring the offerings in today’s parashah.
One chapter later, the tribes are assigned their marching orders. For reasons unexplained, the order is changed. The marching order in chapter two is the same as the donating order in chapter seven. I am going to read the first seven tribes in each list. See if you can catch the difference
The census order begins as follows: Reuven, Shimon, Yehudah, Issachar, Zevulun, Efraim, Menashe, and so on.
The marching and donating order begins: Yehudah, Issachar, Zevulun, Reuven, Shimon, Gad, Efraim, and so on.
Quite a few changes. And although the Torah does not give a reason, these changes are not arbitrary. We have already seen how the midrash captures Reuven’s anger at being demoted from first position to fourth position.
Nachshon from the tribe of Yehudah often gets bumped to first place. This reflects the future ascendancy of Yehudah as the tribe of King David and the seat of the future Southern Kingdom.
You might not have noticed another switch with regard to positions six and seven. In the census order, the tribe of Efraim comes sixth. In the marching and donation order, Efraim comes seventh.
A midrash points out the obvious. If there are twelve consecutive days of donations, at least one of those days must have been Shabbat. The first day was a Sunday. Day seven, therefore, is Shabbat. It is thus a special honor for the Chieftain of Efraim to be able to bring his gifts on this day.
What is so special about Efraim? Efraim is the tribe of Yehoshua, who takes over the leadership of Israel after Moses. Efraim also is destined to become the dominant tribe of the northern Kingdom of Israel.
A Midrash collection called Numbers Rabbah (14:2, 14:3) imagines Joseph observing Shabbat when he is the Prime Minister of Egypt, even though the Torah has not yet been given. In a different version, the midrash notes Joseph’s incredible fortitude at being able to resist the temptations of Potiphar’s wife, motivated by fear of violating God’s holiness. God rewards Joseph’s future descendants, the tribe of Efraim, by accepting their chieftain’s gifts on Shabbat, God’s holy day.
Nachmanides summarizes an extensive series of midrashim that also appear in Numbers Rabbah (chapters 13-14). The chieftains decide, perhaps in response to Netanel from Issachar’s suggestion, to each make a final donation in honor of the dedication of the Mishkan. Each one of them thinks about what he can offer that will be a meaningful gift, that will bring honor to God.
They each, independently, pick out silver bowls and basins, golden ladles, grain, oil, incense, and unblemished animals, and show up at exactly the same time. Surprise, surprise! They all bring the same gift. How embarrassing!
How could this happen?
Nachshon brought a ke’arat kesef, a silver bowl, because in gematria, ke’arat kesef adds up to 930, the number of years that Adam lived. Netanel of Issachar decided to bring his ke’arat kesef because it represents Torah, (based on a wordplay that I am not going to try to explain right now). Eliav from Zevulun picked out his ke’arat kesef because the silver bowl represents the sea, which is how the tribe of Zevulun conducts its trade. And Zevulun is known for supporting all of those Torah scholars from neighboring Issachar.
And so on with each of the tribes. Every chieftain, independently, comes up with a meaningful reason to bring a ke’arat kesef weighing exactly 130 shekels. And similarly with each of the other gifts.
It is, of course, a miracle that all of them came up with the exact same offerings. But even more miraculous is that each of them has a different kavanah, a different intention, for doing so.
God considers all of the gifts equally precious. To convey that preciousness, God commands that each chieftain must show up on his own day to present his offering. Instead of just piling them all up together and sending the givers off, each donor is made to feel special and honored.
What could have been an embarrassing and contentious moment is saved. And we are left with the longest, and certainly not the most boring, chapter of the Torah.
* Order in which the names of Jacob’s sons/tribes appear in various places in the Torah:
Birth Order (Gen 30) |
Jacob’s Blessing
(Gen 49) |
Beginning of Numbers
(Num 1) |
Order of Gifts, Marching Order (Num 2, Num 7) |
Reuben (L1)
Shimon (L2) Levi (L3) Judah (L4) Dan (B1) Naphtali (B2) Gad (Z1) Asher (Z2) Issachar (L5) Zevulun (L6) Joseph (R1) Benjamin (R2) |
Reuben (L1)
Shimon & Levi (L2,3) Judah (L4) Zevulun (L6) Issachar (L5) Dan (B1) Gad (Z1) Asher (Z2) Naphtali (B2) Joseph (R1) Benjamin (R2) |
Reuben (L1)
Shimon (L2) Judah (L4) Issachar (L5) Zevulun (L6) Ephraim (R1b) Menashe (R1a) Benjamin (R2) Dan (B1) Asher (Z2) Gad (Z1) Naphtali (B2) |
Judah (L4) Issachar (L5) Zevulun (L6) Reuben (L1) Shimon (L2) Gad (Z1) Efraim (R1b) Menashe (R1a) Benjamin (R2) Dan (B1) Asher (Z2) Naphtali (B2) |