I Hate Talking About Security – Vayakhel-Pekudei / Shabbat HaḤodesh 5786

This morning, I am going to rant a ittle bit

I hate talking about security. This is not why I became a Rabbi.

My semichah, or Rabbinic ordination certificate, says Ḥakham yitkarei v’Rav yitkarei l’harbitz Torah barabim ul’hafitz ruaḥ da’at v’yirat hashem bein kahal eidato. “He shall be called wise and he shall be called teacher so as to disseminate Torah in public and to spread a spirit of knowledge and awe of the Lord among the congregation of God’s people.”

Nowhere on that document does it say anything about conducting active shooter drills, or installing panic buttons on the podium from which I give my sermons. Or hiring armed security guards.

Antisemitism is so distracting. I was struggling to figure out what I wanted to say this Shabbat, and I just kept losing focus. And so the first thing I wrote down was “I hate talking about security.” And then I figured, “just go with it.” 

But, a big part of my job is to reflect on the current moment through the lens of Jewish tradition. And that is hard in a moment like this, because I do not have any answers to the questions that I think a lot of us are probably wrestling with. Is the war in Iran good for Israel? for the Jewish people? for American Jews? for America? What should we be doing about antisemitism? Are we secure enough? 

I don’t know. None of us can know with certainty. We are all just doing the best we can with limited knowledge and our best intentions. So I am going to talk about Torah, something I know at least a little bit about.

This week’s double portion, Vayak’hel – Pekudei, opens with Moses assembling the entire congregation of the children of Israel. He is going to pass along the instructions about building the Mishkan, the Tabernacle. But first, he spends two verses on Shabbat: “On six days work may be done, but on the seventh day you shall have a sabbath of complete rest, holy to the Lord…”

Several places in the Torah talk about Shabbat. Why here? Our tradition notes the juxtaposition of this passage with the rules for the Mishkan and draws what is perhaps an obvious conclusion. Even such a holy undertaking as building a dwelling place for God must be paused on the seventh day. I am not going to go into a deep discussion of the rules of Shabbat. I would simply like to share a reflection by the German-American psychoanalyst, Erich Fromm.

Shabbat “is the expression of the central idea of Judaism: the idea of freedom; the idea of complete harmony between humanity and nature… By not working—that is to say, by not participating in the process of natural and social change—man is free from the chains of time, although only for one day a week.”

He points out a modern misconception about the ancient idea of Shabbat. It seems fairly obvious to us that we need at least one day a week to take a break, “to be present” or “to unplug” as we would say in contemporary terms. Fromm refers to this fairly self-evident, secular understanding of Shabbat as a “social-hygienic measure intended to give [us] the physical and spiritual rest and relaxation [we] need in order not to be swallowed up by [our] daily work, and to enable [us] to work better during the six working days.” (153)

In ancient times, the “work” that the Torah prohibits was understood as “any interference by man, be it constructive or destructive, with the physical world. ‘Rest’ is a state of peace between man and nature.” (154) This is why ancient Rabbinic sources describe Shabbat as a taste of the world to come, or compare the experience of Shabbat to that of Adam and Eve in the Garden of Eden. It is a return to an idyllic state in which we are totally at one with the universe in which we reside.

As Moses sends the people off to build the Mishkan, he places this freedom before them as an even higher ideal than building a home for God in their midst.

At the very end, as the Book of Exodus comes to a close, God’s Presence, manifested as a pillar of smoke and fire, descends upon the completed Mishkan. The final verse, from the end of the Book of Exodus, reads: “For over the Tabernacle a cloud of the Lord rested by day, and fire would appear in it by night, in the view of all the house of Israel throughout their journeys.” (40:38)

The Israelites have this constant visible sign of God’s Presence among them. It is a Presence that assures them of protection from their enemies, and unlimited access to food and water. In Deuteronomy, we learn that for forty years, their clothing and their shoes never wore out. It was an unnatural time in the history of the Jewish people. Similar to Shabbat as a day of freedom from the chains of time, God’s visible Presence frees the Israelites from the challenges of life in the complicated real world. These two passages bracket our double parashah in which the Israelites work together in apparent harmony and cooperation to build the Mishkan.

As it turns out, the Torah gives us the date of when it all takes place. They bring the various parts to Moses, and on the first day of the first month of the second year after leaving Egypt – in other words, the first day of the month of Nisan – Moses puts it all together. It so happens that the first of Nisan is this week, on Thursday. 

That is why this Shabbat is Shabbat Haḥodesh, the Shabbat of the new moon. We read a special maftir from a second Torah, and chant a haftarah from the Book of Ezekiel. Ezekiel prophesies to the Israelites in exile after the destruction of the first Temple. He addresses his words to the entire people, who are scattered into many nations in the Diaspora. Ezekiel describes how God will bring them back: “I will remove the heart of stone from your body and give you a heart of flesh; and I will put My spirit into you.” When that happens, there will be abundant grain in the fields and fruit on the trees. People will say, “That land, once desolate, has become like the Garden of Eden; and the cities, once ruined, desolate, and ravaged, are now populated and fortified.” Ezekiel is also describing a reality that is perfect, in which all of the troubles of the real world are solved.

In these three passages, we find three episodes in which people facing dangerous, uncertain times are presented with models of hope. Shabbat, as originally presented by Moses to the Israelites, offers a weekly return to the innocence of Eden.  The Mishkan serves as the place over which the visible assurance of God’s protection can be seen. Remember, Moses is speaking to people who, only one year earlier, were slaves in Egypt and who are now homeless in the middle of the desert. Centuries later, Ezekiel is also speaking to persecuted refugees. He tells them that their fortunes will change.

 And so, when I think about the challenges of today: of synagogues being attacked, of Jews being assaulted when they are overheard speaking Hebrew, and of vitriolic antisemitism that is becoming more bold, I try to remember that we have been here before.

We have always had the confidence and hope that things will get better. We have Shabbat, which gives us a taste of the world to come. We have the synagogue, taking the place of the Tabernacle, which brings us together from wherever we happen to be in our journeys. And we have our prophets and timeless teachings which give us a vision of what a perfected world could be, and a roadmap of what we need to do to create it.

Iron in the Shul (After Colleyville) – Yitro 5782

I had the opportunity to learn, earlier this week, from other Conservative Rabbis, which helped me process last week’s hostage taking at Congregation Beth Israel in Colleyville, Texas. Some of what I am going to say this morning was inspired by what I learned from my colleagues.

One thing that I want to say from the outset is that there are a lot of really smart and insightful people who have a lot to say about these specific attack, as well as larger trends in antisemitism here in the United States and around the world. I am sure that you have read and heard a lot that you have found to be educational and meaningful.

I cannot hope to match the expertise of others in our Jewish community who specialize in these areas, nor is that my goal. All I can do is speak from my one particular vantage point as the Rabbi of Congregation Sinai.

A hostage crisis during Shabbat services is just about the scariest thing that I can imagine. It is a horrible scenario that has occupied my mind on many occasions over the years. To hear about it happening last weekend, especially with the prominent, courageous role played by Rabbi Charlie Cytron-Walker, really hit home for me.

It makes me sad, scared, and angry that we have to deal with such things. I don’t think there are any faith groups in the United States that have had to institute such stringent security measures at their houses of worship. It is not something that we should have to do. Simply put, it is not fair, and the need to do so directly contradicts the purpose of a synagogue.

At the end of Parashat Yitro, God delivers a few more commandments to the Israelites through Moses. One stands out. Here is the translation from our Etz Hayim Chumash:

If you make for me an altar of stones, do not build it of hewn stones;

כִּי חַרְבְּךָ הֵנַפְתָּ עָלֶיהָ וַתְּחַלְלֶהָ

for by wielding your tool upon them you have profaned them.

Exodus 20:22

The actual Hebrew word that has been translated “tool” is charb’kha, which actually means “your sword.”

The Mekhilta, an ancient midrash collection, quotes Rabbi Shimon ben Elazar.

The altar was created to lengthen a person’s years, but iron to shorten them. [Iron is the material of weaponry and killing.] It is not appropriate for that which shortens life to be wielded upon that which lengthens life!

Rabbi Yochanan ben Zakai then draws a connection between the altar and peace.   In a passage parallel to our verse, Deuteronomy instructs

אֲבָנִ֤ים שְׁלֵמוֹת֙ תִּבְנֶ֔ה אֶת־מִזְבַּ֖ח ה’ אֱ-לֹהֶ֑יךָ

With whole stones shall you build the altar of the Lord your God.

Deuteronomy 27:6

Noting the word sheleimot – “whole,” Rabbi Yohanan ben Zakai states that these stones of the altar produce shalom – “peace.”  Then he takes it a step further. 

If these stones of the altar, which neither see, nor hear, nor speak, can create peace between the Jewish people and the Holy Blessed One, what about a person who fosters peace between a husband and wife, between one city and the next, between one nation and another, between one government and another government, between one family and another family – how much the more so will such a person not suffer adversity.

Mekhilta d’Rabbi Yishmael 20:22:1-2

It was during Yohanan ben Zakai’s lifetime that the synagogue replaced the altar as the central location for Jewish worship. But it retained the same essential function. The subject of all our prayers, at a fundamental level, is shalom – “peace,” or “wholeness.” It is what we gather in synagogue for, and it is what we should strive for in our personal lives.

The midrash recognizes that there is something symbolically perverse about mixing stone and iron. The altar, and its replacement, the synagogue, should not require the sword to perform its primary function of fostering peace.

But ideals meat reality. We have a security guard at the gate every Shabbat. Our synagogue courtyard is surrounded by black iron bars. We have a sophisticated CCTV system, panic buttons all over our campus, and fancy bulletproof films covering the windows. We hold an Emergency Preparedness Shabbat just about every year during which we actually evacuate the synagogue in the middle of services under the supervision of the San Jose Police Department.

Our synagogue, this house of peace, is not just figuratively hewn from iron, it is covered in it. To protect our sanctuary, we must profane it.

What a sad and unfortunate reality. This is not a subject in which I expected to gain expertise when I decided to become a Rabbi, nor is it one in which I received any training. But it is one which, by necessity, I —we all — have had to reluctantly embrace.  What a steep price we pay.  

Yes, there are financial costs, but the more significant price is spiritual. Nobody should have to fear for their physical safety when they come to shul to pray. Parents should not have to think twice about sending their children to Religious School.  

For years, when I come into this room, I think about escape routes. I look around and try to identify what I could use as a weapon. In a synagogue!

I am done with my harangue.

Rabbi Charlie Cytron-Walker did two really important things last Shabbat: he served tea, and he threw a chair.

You have probably heard the story by now. A man, apparently homeless, showed up on Shabbat morning a few minutes before the start of services. It was cold outside, and he seemed to be seeking a place to warm up. The Rabbi welcomed him warmly, made him a cup of tea, and introduced him to the President of the congregation. At the time, there was no evidence that he posed a threat.

As soon as services began, however, the stranger pulled out a gun, and thus began an eleven hour hostage ordeal.

Towards the end, as he became increasingly agitated, Rabbi Cytron-Walker saw an opportunity.  He indicated to the two other congregants who were being held that they should be ready to attempt an escape. At a moment when the hostage taker seemed distracted, he threw a chair at him and the three of them quickly escaped.

An act of compassion and kindness, and an act of courage and, frankly, violence. Both acts should inspire us. We can look to two biblical women, both non-Israelites, whose stories model similar behaviors.

In the Book of Ruth, after her husband, brother-in-law, and father-in-law all die, Ruth binds herself and her fate to Naomi, her mother-in-law.  They return from Moab to Bethlehem, arriving destitute at the beginning of the barley harvest.

As chapter two opens, Ruth informs Naomi, “I would like to go to the fields and glean among the ears of grain, behind someone who may show me kindness.”  (Ruth 2:2)

What does this simple statement reveal? That Ruth, a Moabitess, knows that this place, where she has never set foot, is one in which a poor, foreign woman can go harvest for herself on a field belonging to another. The Book of Ruth does not mention the Torah’s obligation to leave the corners of the fields unharvested, among other mitzvot pertaining to tzedakah.

The details of the laws are beside the point. What matters is reputation. These people of Bethlehem are known to practice kindness, so when Ruth declares her intention, Naomi responds “Yes, daughter, go.”

Being compassionate, opening up our doors to let the stranger in, makes us vulnerable. Letting a stranger into our shul is a risk. That is why behaving with compassion is an act of faith, but would we prefer a Judaism which did not welcome the stranger? What would we be if we put up barriers that kept everyone else out?

Of course, evil exists. We cannot be so naive as to think that there are not those who hate us simply for being Jews.  Last weekend was the third violent attack in a synagogue on Shabbat in America in just over three years.  There have been six deadly antisemitic attacks in the United States since 2016.

According to FBI statistics, over the last several years Jews have been the targets of around 12% of all hate crimes.  Nearly two thirds of religion-based hate crimes have targeted Jews.  And we are less than two percent of the overall population.

Antisemitism is real and growing. It is not confined to a particular political ideology. Those who hate us for being Jewish do not care whether we are Reform, Conservative, or Orthodox, Democrats or Republicans. Our preparation and readiness are not misplaced.

This brings us to our second non-Israelite heroine.

Last Shabbat, while our fellow Jews were being held hostage, we read in the Haftarah about Yael. The Canaanite King Jabin had subjugated the Israelites for the past twenty years, with Sisera serving as the commander of his troops. Under the spiritual guidance and encouragement of the Chieftain Deborah, Barak leads the Israelites into victorious battle against Sisera with his nine hundred iron chariots. 

The Canaanite General flees, seeking refuge in the tent of Yael, wife of Heber the Kenite.  She offers him hospitality, feeds him, gives him milk to drink, and covers him with blankets so that he can fall asleep. Then she takes a tent peg and drives it with a hammer through his skull into the ground. In her victory song, Deborah praises this heroine.

Most blessed of women be Jael,
Wife of Heber the Kenite,
Most blessed of women in tents.

He asked for water, she offered milk;
In a princely bowl she brought him curds.

Her [left] hand reached for the tent pin,
Her right for the workmen’s hammer.
She struck Sisera, crushed his head,
Smashed and pierced his temple.

At her feet he sank, lay outstretched,
At her feet he sank, lay still;
Where he sank, there he lay—destroyed.

Judges 5:24:27

Ours is not a tradition that would have us be passive when threatened or attacked. Judaism recognizes that evil exists, and that we have a duty to fight it, that there are those who hate us, and that we must defend ourselves. Sometimes that means we must use force.

This is the uncomfortable place in which we find ourselves. How do we embrace a message of hope and peace, of compassion and openness, while also protecting ourselves from the very real threats that exist?

We cannot afford to simplistically think that there is a satisfying answer out there, if only we can find it.  The Jewish people knows that the world is messy, that human beings are imperfect and often unreliable. That our loftiest ideals have a tendency to slam into disappointing reality.

I come back to our name as a people, the name given to Jacob after he wrestles with the unnamed angel.  Yisrael – for you have striven with beings Divine and human and stayed in the game. That is who we are, and who we must continue to be.

We pray for a time when we can tear down all of the walls, remove the panic buttons and cancel the evacuation drills. In the meantime, we are Yisrael – the people who struggle. We remain committed to each other, to acting with compassion and kindness, to keeping each other safe, and to pursuing shalom in our prayers and our deeds.

Think for a moment: what are the last two words that we recite at the end of every Shabbat morning service?

At the end of Adon Olam, which we typically invite our children to lead, the final words are v’lo ira, words are aspirational and declarative: “I will not be afraid.”